Quantitative analysis based on chest CT classifies common and severe patients with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia in Wuhan, China.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare quantifiable radiologic findings and their dynamic change throughout the clinical course of common and severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and to provide valuable evidence for radiologic classification of the two types of this disease. METHODS: 112 patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were retrospectively analyzed. Volumetric percentage of infection and density of the lung were measured by a computer-aided software. Clinical parameters were recorded to reflect disease progression. Baseline data and dynamic change were compared between two groups and a decision-tree algorithm was developed to determine the cut-off value for classification. RESULTS: 93 patients were finally included and were divided into common group (n = 76) and severe group (n = 17) based on current criteria. Compared with common patients, severe patients experienced shorter advanced stage, peak time and plateau, but longer absorption stage. The dynamic change of volume and density coincided with the clinical course. The interquartile range of volumetric percentage of the two groups were 1.0-7.2% and 11.4-31.2%, respectively. Baseline volumetric percentage of infection was significantly higher in severe group, and the cut-off value of it was 10.10%. CONCLUSIONS: Volumetric percentage between severe and common patients was significantly different. Because serial CT scans are systemically performed in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, this quantitative analysis can simultaneously provide valuable information for physicians to evaluate their clinical course and classify common and severe patients accurately.

Myocardial injury and risk factors for mortality in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia tends to affect cardiovascular system and cause cardiovascular damage. This study aimed to explore the prevalence of myocardial injury and risk factors for mortality in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. METHOD: Two hundred and twenty-four consecutive patients with confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and definite outcomes (discharge or death) were retrospectively analyzed. Laboratory results including myocardial biomarkers, oxygen saturation, inflammatory indicators and coagulation function were compared between survivors and non-survivors. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression model were used to explore risk factors for in-hospital mortality, and a chart with different combinations of risk factors was constructed to predict mortality. RESULTS: Two hundred and three patients were included in the final analysis, consisting of 145 patients who recovered and 58 patients who died. Compared with survivors, non-survivors were older, with more comorbidities, more severe inflammation and active coagulation function, higher levels of myocardial biomarkers and lower SaO2. 28 (50%) non-survivors and 9 (6%) survivors developed myocardial injury, which was associated with disease severity at admission. Elevated d-dimer (OR = 9.51, 95% CI [3.61-25.0], P < 0.001), creatinine kinase-myocardial band (OR = 6.93, 95% CI [1.83-26.2], P = 0.004), Troponin I (OR = 10.1, 95% CI [3.1-32.8], P < 0.001) and C-reactive protein (OR = 15.1, 95% CI [1.7-129.3], P = 0.013) were risk factors for mortality. Patients with abnormal levels of d-dimer, Troponin I and CRP were predicted to have significantly higher probability of death. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that SARS-CoV-2 infection may induce myocardial injury and consequently exacerbate the clinical course and worsen prognosis. Abnormal d-dimer, CK-MB, Troponin I and CRP are risk factors for short-term mortality.

Elevated carcinoembryonic antigen in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.

PURPOSE: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) tends to affect multiple organs and induce abnormal laboratory parameters. We designed this study to investigate the association between carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) elevation and SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 177 patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who received plasma CEA assays during hospitalization. Patients with other causes of CEA elevation were excluded. Data regarding epidemiological and demographical characteristics, clinical symptoms, laboratory tests, and outcomes were analyzed. Linear regression analysis was used to evaluate the correlation between CEA levels and inflammation severity. RESULTS: 171 patients were included in the final study and 32 patients (18.7%) had raised serum of CEA (> 5 ng/ml), with a median (range) age of 66 (53-86). The median [interquartile range (IQR)] CEA level was 11.4 ng/ml (8.1-21.6), which was significantly higher than the upper limit of reference range. CEA level between 5-10 ng/ml was in 11 patients, 10-15 ng/ml in 10 patients, and > 15 ng/ml in 11 patients. No correlation was found between CEA levels and lymphocyte (R2 = 0.055; P = 0.10) nor CRP (R2 = 0.026; P = 0.38). The median levels of CEA were 20.0 ng/ml (IQR, 14.7-23.0) in non-survivors and 10.9 ng/ml (IQR 7.5-16.1) in survivors, and the difference between two groups was statistically significant (P = 0.048). CONCLUSION: SARS-CoV-2 infection might be another cause of CEA elevation, with nearly 20% of patients experienced transient and marked CEA increment during COVID-19 pneumonia. The false-positive results of CEA elevation might have clinical significance for patients with colorectal cancer.

COVID-19 patients with hypertension have more severe disease: a multicenter retrospective observational study.

This study aims to explore the effect of hypertension on disease progression and prognosis in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). A total of 310 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were studied. A comparison was made between two groups of patients, those with hypertension and those without hypertension. Their demographic data, clinical manifestations, laboratory indicators, and treatment methods were collected and analyzed. A total of 310 patients, including 113 patients with hypertension and 197 patients without hypertension, were included in the analysis. Compared with patients without hypertension, patients with hypertension were older, were more likely to have diabetes and cerebrovascular disease, and were more likely to be transferred to the intensive care unit. The neutrophil count and lactate dehydrogenase, fibrinogen, and D-dimer levels in hypertensive patients were significantly higher than those in nonhypertensive patients (P < 0.05). However, multivariate analysis (adjusted for age and sex) failed to show that hypertension was an independent risk factor for COVID-19 mortality or severity. COVID-19 patients with hypertension were more likely than patients without hypertension to have severe pneumonia, excessive inflammatory reactions, organ and tissue damage, and deterioration of the disease. Patients with hypertension should be given additional attention to prevent worsening of their condition.